The Problem
Separate teams mean separate data, separate queues, and separate decisions on what is often the same underlying criminal activity. The result: investigations that are closed without seeing the full picture, and SAR filings that tell half the story.
Fraud signals
Verafye
AML signals
Where Silos Fail
Same mule account, two separate alerts
Fraud closes the account-level case. AML never sees the network. The ring continues operating through connected accounts neither team examined.
Siloed data, duplicated review effort
Fraud analysts query one system. AML analysts query another. Both spend time assembling context that already exists — in different databases.
No shared handoff between teams
A fraud escalation with AML implications has no structured pathway. It moves via email or verbal handoff, losing evidence fidelity along the way.
Regulatory blind spots at the intersection
SAR filing decisions require both fraud and AML context. When those contexts live in separate tools, the SAR narrative is always incomplete.
The Verafye Approach
Verafye does not ask fraud teams and AML teams to merge. It connects their data so that any analyst — regardless of which team they sit in — can see the full scope of the risk before closing a case or filing a SAR.
Fraud Prevention
Device, behavioral, and payment fraud signals feed into the same investigation surface as AML data — no separate queue.
AML & Transaction Monitoring
Transaction typologies and entity-level risk scoring surface alongside fraud indicators in every case.
Investigation Intelligence
Alert clustering, case workflows, and evidence packs work across both fraud and AML alert types without separate tooling.
Decision Intelligence
The entity graph resolves relationships across both fraud and AML signal sources — so the connection between a fraud ring and a structuring pattern is visible.
AI Copilot
Case summaries and SAR narratives pull from the full cross-domain evidence pack — not just the fraud or AML slice.
Buyers
If your fraud team and AML team are regularly escalating to each other but working in separate systems, a Risk Shadowing Review will show you specifically where those handoffs are creating gaps — using your own transaction and entity data.
Get Started
A Risk Shadowing Review runs Verafye's connected detection models on your real data — so you see the gaps, not a demo scenario.
